Sign in

Abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWAccurate prediction of protein-ligand binding affinities remains a cornerstone problem in drug discovery. While binding affinity is inherently dictated by the 3D structure and dynamics of protein-ligand complexes, current deep learning approaches are limited by the lack of high-quality experimental structures with annotated binding affinities. To address this limitation, we introduce the Struc-turally Augmented IC50 Repository (SAIR), the largest publicly available dataset of protein-ligand 3D structures with associated activity data. The dataset com-prises 5, 244, 285 structures across 1, 048, 857 unique protein-ligand systems, cu-rated from the ChEMBL and BindingDB databases, which were then computa-tionally folded using the Boltz-1x model. We provide a comprehensive charac-terization of the dataset, including distributional statistics of proteins and ligands, and evaluate the structural fidelity of the folded complexes using PoseBusters. Our analysis reveals that approximately 3% of structures exhibit physical anoma-lies, predominantly related to internal energy violations. As an initial demon-stration, we benchmark several binding affinity prediction methods, including empirical scoring functions (Vina, Vinardo), a 3D convolutional neural network (Onionnet-2), and a graph neural network (AEV-PLIG). While machine learning-based models consistently outperform traditional scoring function methods, nei-ther exhibit a high correlation with ground truth affinities, highlighting the need for models specifically fine-tuned to synthetic structure distributions. This work provides a foundation for developing and evaluating next-generation structure and binding-affinity prediction models and offers insights into the structural and phys-ical underpinnings of protein-ligand interactions. The dataset can be found at https://www.sandboxaq.com/sair.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISWei '25Ryczko '26Nelen '26Seo '21Wu '25Cheng '26
81% semantic matchBioinformatics
Jinhang Wei, Yupu Zhang, Peter Ramdhan+5 more·bioRxiv·Sep 29, 2025· 3 citations