Sign in
BiophysicsbioRxiv
Preprint

Mitigating Permittivity-Charge Cross-Sensitivity in Biomolecular Sensing: Electrostatic Decoupling and Feedforward Biasing in an Asymmetric Dual-Gate a-IGZO FET

Bakhsh Mohammed MahannaiD, Muntasir AminiD, Muhammed Shafayat JamiliD, Mohammad Masum BillahiD

Abstract

Permittivity-based biomolecular identification is inherently ambiguous in real-world sensing environments because analyte charge also influences the measured electrical response. Different combinations of charge and permittivity can produce similar electrical responses, so a change in the measured response cannot be uniquely attributed to permittivity. This work combines electrostatic decoupling through device engineering with charge-conditioned feedforward biasing to mitigate this cross-sensitivity and recover both analyte properties through direct drain-current readings from a single transistor. We provide a proof of concept through technology computer-aided design (TCAD) simulations of an asymmetric dual-gate, dual-nanogap amorphous indium-gallium-zinc oxide (a-IGZO) transistor. Gate-insulator dielectric engineering and nanogap optimization establish complementary drain-current responses, with the bottom gate predominantly sensing analyte charge and the top gate predominantly sensing permittivity. Feedforward biasing further suppresses residual charge interference in the top-gate response. First, the bottom-gate drain current provides an estimate of analyte charge. This estimate and a preliminary top-gate current reading are used to select the voltage for the final top-gate measurement. The drain current measured at that voltage then determines permittivity. Three sequential current readings thus provide permittivity-based biomolecular identification without prior knowledge of analyte charge, alongside complementary charge measurement. Mean charge and permittivity extraction errors remain below 1.8% and 0.6%, respectively, across the calibration and independent test datasets.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.