Predictive stability code: Trial-by-trial conflict expectations tune task representations via proactive and reactive spatio-temporo-spectral dynamics
Giada VivianiiD, Antonino VisalliiD, Maria MontefineseiD, Irene Di PietroiD, Antonino VallesiiD, Marı́a RuziD, Ettore AmbrosiniiD
Abstract
Cognitive stability, or task focus, enables goal-directed behavior through representational dynamics: by prioritizing task-relevant representations over competing task-irrelevant ones. Beyond corrective reactive mechanisms operating after conflict arises, stability can also be engaged predictively through the statistical learning of conflict regularities, either proactively, based on global conflict expectations, or through a predictive reactive mode, guided by item-specific conflict expectations. Yet, the representational mechanisms enabling such predictive adjustments remain underspecified. We addressed this by re-analyzing EEG data from a spatial Stroop task concurrently manipulating list-wide (LWPC) and item-specific (ISPC) proportion congruency. Moving beyond existing analytical approaches, we developed a framework that combines trial-by-trial Bayesian conflict-expectancy modeling with a novel spatio-temporo-spectral searchlight Representational Similarity Analysis, and leveraged directional representational modeling complemented by ridge-regression decoding. We first identified the necessary computational substrate for predictive stability reconfigurations: the spatio-temporo-spectral patterns encoding task (Target, Distractor) and conflict-expectancy (LWPC, ISPC) representations, with the latter already encoded in the pre-stimulus windows. Crucially, conflict expectations modulated Target and Distractor encoding strength with distinct spatio-temporal and spectral dynamics, revealing a functional dissociation. LWPC-induced proactive stability follows a "Target-first" policy, primarily strengthening the Target representation early after stimulus onset via Alpha and lower-Beta patterns, and weakening Distractor encoding only later; conversely, ISPC-induced predictive reactive stability follows a "Distractor-first" policy, rapidly weakening Distractor encoding via response-locked posterior Beta patterns, and strengthening the Target representation only downstream. Our study refines theoretical cognitive control models, incorporating a mechanistic explanation for predictive stability, while also establishing a multidimensional methodological template for investigating the underlying substrates of adaptive behavior and beyond.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Neural mechanisms underlying expectation-dependent inhibition of distracting information
Dirk van Moorselaar, Eline Lampers, … Heleen A. Slagter·eLifePeer-reviewed·Dec 15, 2020
- Predictive processing for sensory and action neural representations
Gabriela Yukari Iwama, Assaf Breska, Randolph F. Helfrich·bioRxiv·Mar 26, 2025
- Predicting the irrelevant: Neural effects of distractor predictability depend on load
Troby Ka‐Yan Lui, Jonas Obleser, Malte Wöstmann·European Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Neural dynamics of proactive and reactive cognitive control in medial and lateral prefrontal cortex
Anas U. Khan, Colin W. Hoy, … J. Nicole Bentley·iSciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 14, 2025
- Bayesian mapping reveals that attention boosts neural responses to predicted and unpredicted stimuli
Marta Isabel Garrido, Elise Rowe, … Jason B. Mattingley·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Mar 27, 2017
- Individual prediction tendencies do not generalise across modalities
Juliane Schubert, Nina Suess, Nathan Weisz·bioRxiv·Feb 2, 2023