Sign in
GenomicsNAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
Peer-reviewed journal article

A theoretical and experimental framework enables low-coverage sequencing for accurate quantification of genome-wide cytosine modification levels

Christian E. LooiD, Johanna M. FowleriD, Heqiao Zhu, Christopher J. KrappiD, Ruiyao ZhuiD, Marisa S. BartolomeiiD, Wanding ZhouiD, Rahul M. KohliiD

Abstract

5-methylcytosine (5mC) and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) regulate gene expression and exhibit dynamic levels during development and disease. While high-depth, base-resolution studies offer the most detailed view of epigenetic landscapes, many open questions are answered by surveying changes in 5mC/5hmC levels across larger cohorts. Nonetheless, current global quantification methods, including mass spectrometry, are typically limited in accessibility, accuracy, or throughput. Here, to evaluate the viability of low-coverage sequencing as an alternative, we first computationally downsampled deeply sequenced data to resolve the three-way relationship between sequencing coverage, modification levels, and measurement error. This relationship allowed us to develop a facile online tool for error calculation and to define experimental targets: <0.24% genome coverage can quantify 5mC and low-abundance 5hmC with minimal and predictable errors (<5%). Importantly, in direct comparisons, low-depth sequencing (Sparse-Seq) demonstrated high accuracy and less variability than mass spectrometry, while distinctively preserving genomic context. Applied serially to developing mouse brains, Sparse-Seq revealed an earlier emergence of 5hmCpG compared to 5mCpH and uncovered previously overlooked, genomic feature-specific epigenetic changes. This work establishes a rigorous foundation for employing Sparse-Seq as a highly accessible approach for 5mC/5hmC quantification, enabling economical first-pass analysis of epigenetic landscapes suited for large cohort studies and new hypothesis generation.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISFoox '20Chen '25Silva '22Fabyanic '23Gabrieli '18Wei '24
60% semantic matchGenomics
Jonathan Foox, Jessica Nordlund, Claudia Lalancette+54 more·bioRxiv·Dec 14, 2020· 2 citations