Accurate bacterial outbreak tracing with Oxford Nanopore sequencing and reduction of methylation-induced errors
Mara LohdeiD, Gabriel E. WagneriD, Johanna Dabernig‐HeinziD, Adrian ViehwegeriD, Sascha D. Braun, Stefan MoneckeiD, Celia Diezel, Claudia SteiniD, Mike MarquetiD, Ralf EhrichtiD, Mathias Wilhelm PletziD, Christian BrandtiD
Abstract
Our study investigated the effectiveness of Oxford Nanopore Technologies for accurate outbreak tracing by resequencing 33 isolates of a three-year-long Klebsiella pneumoniae outbreak with Illumina short read sequencing data as the point of reference. We detected considerable base errors through cgMLST and phylogenetic analysis of genomes sequenced with Oxford Nanopore Technologies, leading to the false exclusion of some outbreak-related strains from the outbreak cluster. Nearby methylation sites cause these errors and can also be found in other species besides K. pneumoniae. Based on this data, we explored PCR-based sequencing and a masking strategy, which both successfully addressed these inaccuracies and ensured accurate outbreak tracing. We offer our masking strategy as a bioinformatic workflow (MPOA is freely available on GitHub under the GNUv3 license: github.com/replikation/MPOA) to identify and mask problematic genome positions in a reference-free manner. Our research highlights limitations in using Oxford Nanopore Technologies for sequencing prokaryotic organisms, especially for investing outbreaks. For time-critical projects that cannot wait for further technological developments by Oxford Nanopore Technologies, our study recommends either PCR-based sequencing or using our provided bioinformatic workflow. We would advise that read mapping-based quality control of genomes should be provided when publishing results.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 32
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Oxford Nanopore's 2024 sequencing technology for Listeria monocytogenes outbreak detection and source attribution: progress and clone-specific challenges
Michael Biggel, Nicole Cernela, … Roger Stephan·Journal of Clinical MicrobiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 4, 2024
- Nanopore-only assemblies for genomic surveillance of the global priority drug-resistant pathogen, Klebsiella pneumoniae
Ebenezer Foster-Nyarko, Hugh Cottingham, … Kathryn E. Holt·Microbial GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Feb 8, 2023
- Resolving a neonatal intensive care unit outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus to the SNV level using Oxford Nanopore simplex reads and HERRO error correction
Max Bloomfield, Sarah Bakker, … Rhys T. White·Journal of Hospital InfectionPeer-reviewed·Jun 24, 2025
- OxBreaker: species-agnostic pipeline for the analysis of outbreaks using nanopore sequencing
Carlos Reding, Katie M.V. Hopkins, … Bernadette Young·bioRxiv·Mar 19, 2026
- Single laboratory evaluation of the (Q20+) nanopore sequencing kit for bacterial outbreak investigations
Maria Hoffmann, Jiyeon Jang, … Narjol González‐Escalona·International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewed·Nov 5, 2024
- Phylodynamic modelling of bacterial outbreaks using nanopore sequencing
Eike J. Steinig, Sebastián Duchêne, … Paul F. Horwood·bioRxiv·Apr 30, 2021