Sign in
PathologybioRxiv
Preprint

Generating cell-level protein-expression labels on HE from serial-section immunohistochemistry, with ground-truth-free quality control

Eunji JangiD, Yong‐Min HuhiD

Abstract

A laboratory that stains immunohistochemistry (IHC) on a section adjacent to a hematoxylin and eosin (HE) section already holds the material to supervise HE models on its own cases. It goes unused because adjacent sections sample non-identical cells, and residual registration error prevents assigning IHC labels to individual HE cells. We present CellDF (Cell Displacement Field), which turns registered serial-section data into pairs of HE cells and the protein-expression labels measured on the adjacent section. CellDF estimates a locally adaptive residual displacement field through iterated kernel regression over each HE cell's K nearest IHC candidates; a sparse-kernel variant keeps it tractable at whole-slide cell counts, where pairwise matchers are not. The within-tile distribution of these displacements yields two ground-truth-free statistics, the directional scatter {sigma}{theta} and the between-tile angular deviation |{Delta}{theta}|, that localize matching quality more finely than landmark-based target registration error and drive a two-stage filter that withholds labels where matching is unreliable. On 54 same-section HyReCo pairs, {sigma}{theta} correlates only moderately with landmark error and flags localized restaining damage that global error misses; on 30 four-marker Acrobat serial-section cases, the same statistic identifies which IHC marker, if any, lies close enough to HE for cell-level transfer. As a proof of concept, transferred labels trained a cell classifier on HE embeddings that generalized to held-out cells within the sample (F1 0.85, AUROC 0.88). A laboratory can thereby generate cell-level protein-expression labels from its own sections and tune HE-only models on them, with each label set's reliability read from the data.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.