Sign in
Pharmacology & ToxicologybioRxiv
Preprint

A Structure-Based hERG Pose Selection Workflow Integrating Induced-Fit Docking, Shape Similarity, Interaction Fingerprints, and Molecular Dynamics

Purvi NeemaiD, Umut OzuguzeliD, Saeed NajafianiD, Bodhisattwa ChaudhuriiD

Abstract

The recent availability of several ligand-bound hERG/Kv11.1 cryo-EM structures creates an opportunity for prospective structure-based modeling, but it also introduces a practical problem: a new ligand may be compatible with only a subset of the available receptor conformations, and docking may generate several plausible poses within each template. We therefore evaluated a template-aware pose-selection framework using the astemizole-, pimozide-, and E4031-bound hERG structures as experimental reference environments, with apo 8ZYN included as a receptor-state control. The ligand set separated into two study-defined chemical regions: a low-polarity, highly lipophilic Group I represented by astemizole and pimozide, and a more polar Group II represented by E4031. Induced-fit docking (IFD) improved self-docking relative to rigid Glide, whereas apo 8ZYN did not reproduce ligand-bound behavior during short molecular dynamics (MD) assessment. Across the retrospective ligand-bound analyses, six of seven group-matched systems met the dual MD-quality criterion, whereas none of eight group-mismatched systems did. Highest static shape similarity was the most consistent pose-selection criterion for Group I, while an interaction-fingerprint (IFP)-favored 30:70 shape:IFP composite was retained provisionally for the single retrospective Group II reference. Application to dofetilide, ibutilide, and terfenadine produced binding hypotheses with residue-contact patterns consistent with independent hERG literature. Together, these results support using ligand-bound hERG structures as chemically selective reference environments for pose prioritization rather than as interchangeable receptor templates.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.