Electroencephalography for Radiation-Free Orientation Estimation of Directional Deep Brain Stimulation Leads
Suvadeep MaitiiD, Alan Bince JacobiD, Marco MancusoiD, Marie T. Krüger, Harith AkramiD, Kirill Y. AristovichiD, Vladimir Litvak AiD
Abstract
Background: Programming segmented deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads requires knowledge of their rotational orientation, but current postoperative workflows rely mainly on radiographic imaging. Objective: To develop and evaluate a radiation-free electroencephalography (EEG) framework for directional lead orientation estimation, in a realistic phantom and postoperative human data. Methods: A realistic head phantom containing a directional DBS lead was mounted on a rotating tray and stepped through known orientations in 5{degrees} increments to evaluate EEG-based orientation estimation. Stimulation artefact topographies were compared with forward-model predictions using Pearson correlation, and a tri-montage approach combined estimates from all three same-ring electrode pairs to improve accuracy. Robustness was tested by adding brain noise and reducing the electrode count. The method was then applied to a patient with bilateral directional DBS leads implanted in the globus pallidus. Robustness in the human data was assessed by reducing the sampling rate and the number of EEG electrodes. Results: In the phantom, the best simplified forward model was a tangential BEM dipole positioned midway between the active contacts. The tri-montage reduced the maximal mean orientation error to 0.59{degrees} (95% CI: 4.4{degrees}). A conservative tray-position analysis yielded a pooled mean error of 2.05{degrees} (95% CI: 3.20{degrees}). In the human dataset, EEG-derived orientations differed from imaging-based references by about 8{degrees} for the right lead and 15{degrees} for the left lead, and remained stable after downsampling and montage reduction. Conclusions: Phantom validation established the key modelling assumptions, and postoperative human recordings showed that EEG can recover clinically plausible directional lead orientations under realistic conditions.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Directional DBS Leads Show Large Deviations from their Intended Implantation Orientation
Till A. Dembek, Moritz Hoevels, … Harald Treuer·Parkinsonism & Related DisordersPeer-reviewed·Aug 27, 2019
- Artifacts can be deceiving: The actual location of deep brain stimulation electrodes differs from the artifact seen on magnetic resonance images
Noa B Nuzov, Bhumi Bhusal, … Laleh Golestanirad·Stereotactic and Functional NeurosurgeryPeer-reviewed·Dec 16, 2022
- Orientation of Directional Deep Brain Stimulation Leads on CT: Resolving the Ambiguity
Rebecca Kurtev-Rittstieg, Stefan Achatz, … Stephan Mittermeyer·bioRxiv·Sep 16, 2020
- Deep Brain Stimulation: Imaging on a group level
Svenja Treu, Bryan Andrew Strange, … Andreas Horn·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jun 4, 2020
- Experimental Validation of Finite Element Models for Directional DBS: The Critical Role of Boundary Conditions on VTA Accuracy
Kaylee R. Henry, Fuchang Jiang, … Laleh Golestanirad·bioRxiv·Apr 7, 2026
- Evaluating the Influence of Anatomical Accuracy and Electrode Positions on EEG Forward Solutions
Jesper Duemose Nielsen, Oula Puonti, … Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jun 29, 2023