Neural Interoceptive Processing is Modulated by Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment Resistant Depression
Elisa XuiD, Samantha Pitts, Jacob Francis Dahill-FucheliD, Sara Scherrer, Tanya NauveliD, Jacqueline A. OvertoniD, Patricio Riva‐PosseiD, Andrea L. CrowelliD, Martijn FigeeiD, Sankaraleengam AlagapaniD, Christopher J. RozelliD, Ki Sueng ChoiiD, Helen S. MaybergiD, Allison C. WatersiD
Abstract
BackgroundA critical advance in depression research is to clarify the hypothesized role of interoceptive processing in neural mechanisms of treatment efficacy. This study tests whether cortical interoceptive processing, as indexed by the heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP), is modulated by deep brain stimulation (DBS) to the subcallosal cingulate (SCC) for treatment resistant depression (TRD). MethodsEight patients with TRD were enrolled in a study of SCC DBS safety and efficacy. Electroencephalography (EEG) and symptom severity measures were sampled in a laboratory setting over the course of a six-month treatment protocol. The primary outcome measure was an EEG-derived HEP, which reflects cortical processing of heartbeat sensation. Cluster-based permutation analyses were used to test the effect of stimulation and time in treatment on the HEP. The change in signal magnitude after treatment was correlated with change in depression severity as measured by the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. ResultsHEP amplitude was greater after 24 weeks of treatment (t(7)=-4.40, p=.003, g=-1.38, 95% Cl [-2.3, -0.42]), and this change was inversely correlated with latency of treatment response (rho = -0.75, 95% Cl [-0.95, -0.11], p=.03). An acute effect of DBS was also observed, but as a decrease in HEP amplitude (t(6) =6.66, p<.001, g=2.19, 95% Cl [0.81, 3.54]). HEP differences were most pronounced over left posterior sensors from 405-425 ms post-stimulus. ConclusionBrain-based evidence substantiates a theorized link between interoception and depression, and suggests an interoceptive contribution to the mechanism of treatment efficacy with deep brain stimulation for severe depression.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 5
- FWCI
- 1.34
- Field percentile
- top 19%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Longitudinal Changes in Cortical Response Dynamics with Deep Brain Stimulation to the Subcallosal Cingulate for Treatment-Resistant Depression
Aashna Desai, Tine Van Bogaert, … Allison C. Waters·bioRxiv·Nov 26, 2025
- Dopamine and serotonin transients predict depressive symptom relief following deep brain stimulation of human subcallosal cingulate cortex
Blair R. K. Shevlin, Qi Xiu Fu, … Xiaosi Gu·Biological PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Apr 25, 2026
- Brain mechanisms underlying the emotion processing bias in treatment-resistant depression
Xiaoxu Fan, Madaline M. Mocchi, … Kelly Rowe Bijanki·Nature Mental HealthPeer-reviewed·Apr 16, 2024
- Decoding Depression During Subcallosal Cingulate Deep Brain Stimulation
Vineet Tiruvadi, Ashan Veerakumar, … Helen S. Mayberg·bioRxiv·Jul 27, 2022
- Towards individualized deep brain stimulation: A stereoelectroencephalography-based workflow for neurostimulation target identification
Jeremy Saal, KELLY H. KADLEC, … Kristin K. Sellers·Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural InterfacePeer-reviewed·Dec 13, 2025
- Excitation-Inhibition Balance and Fronto-Limbic Connectivity Drive TMS Treatment Outcomes in Refractory Depression
Davide Momi, Zheng Wang, … John David Griffiths·bioRxiv·Apr 23, 2025