Chromatin priming and Hunchback recruitment integrate spatial and temporal cues in Drosophila neuroblasts
Abstract
Neural stem cells generate diverse cell types by integrating spatial and temporal cues to activate neuron-specific terminal selector (TS) genes. In Drosophila neuroblasts (NBs), spatial patterning sets lineage identity, while a temporal transcription factor (TTF) cascade sets birth order. Two proposed mechanisms could integrate these inputs. In direct regulation, spatial transcription factors (STFs) and TTFs co-occupy and regulate TS enhancers within NBs. In epigenetic regulation, STFs first prime NB-specific chromatin, creating selected enhancers that can later recruit TTFs. We tested these models in the NB5-6 and NB7-4 lineages using their candidate STFs, Gooseberry (Gsb) and Engrailed (En), together with the first TTF, Hunchback (Hb). We find that En preferentially occupies pre-accessible chromatin in the NB7-4 lineage, including highly accessible En-Hb co-bound sites. This is consistent with En acting within an already established chromatin landscape whose formation likely depends on additional NB7-4 factors. In contrast, Gsb binds both accessible and less-accessible chromatin in the NB5-6 lineage and can remodel accessibility bidirectionally when ectopically expressed in NB7-4 lineage, with corresponding changes in Hb occupancy. However, Gsb binding alone does not determine which sites become accessible or recruit Hb, indicating that productive Gsb-Hb regulatory states require additional NB5-6-specific inputs. Thus, direct and epigenetic regulation are not alternative mechanisms, but distinct steps within the integration process. We therefore propose a third possibility: distributed STF code model in which these steps -- chromatin priming and direct STF-Hb engagement -- are distributed across the members of each NB-specific STF code. The STF code therefore shapes the enhancer landscape available to Hb and enables productive Hb engagement at lineage-appropriate enhancers.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Neuroblast-specific chromatin landscapes allow integration of spatial and temporal cues to generate neuronal diversity in Drosophila
Sonia Sen, Sachin Chanchani, … Chris Q. Doe·bioRxiv·Dec 2, 2018
- Temporal regulation of a spatial patterning factor in Drosophila neurogenesis
Rose Coyne, Fahad Kamulegeya, … Mehmet Neset Özel·bioRxiv·Sep 14, 2026
- Vnd and En are expressed in orthogonal stripes and act in a brief competence window to combinatorially specify NB7-1 and its early lineage
Nathan L.Q. Anderson, Sen-Lin Lai, Chris Q. Doe·Developmental BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 15, 2026
- Dynamics of activating and repressive histone modifications in Drosophila neural stem cell lineages and brain tumors
Merve Deniz Abdusselamoglu, Lisa Landskron, … Juergen A. Knoblich·DevelopmentPeer-reviewed·Nov 20, 2019
- Regulatory logic of neuronal differentiation in the Drosophila visual system
McKenzie Treese, Yen‐Chung Chen, … Mehmet Neset Özel·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Aug 19, 2026
- Positional cues, not Notch, direct Neuroblast selection during early neurogenesis in the Drosophila embryo
David Green, Khalil Mazouni, … François Schweisguth·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 12, 2026