Sign in
MicrobiologybioRxiv

High-throughput multi-parallel enteropathogen quantification via nano-liter qPCR

J. A. Grembi, K. Mayer-Blackwell, S. P. Luby, A. M. Spormann

Abstract

Quantitative molecular diagnostic methods, such as qPCR, can effectively detect pathogen-specific nucleic acid sequences. However, costs associated with multi-pathogen quantitative molecular diagnostics hinder their widespread use. Nano-liter qPCR (nL-qPCR) is a miniaturized tool for quantification of multiple targets in large numbers of samples based on assay parallelization on a single chip, with potentially significant cost-savings due to rapid throughput and reduced reagent volumes. We evaluated a suite of novel and published assays to detect 17 enteric pathogens using a commercially available nL-qPCR technology. Assay efficiencies ranged from 88-98% (mean 91%) and were reproducible across four operators at two separate facilities. When applied to complex fecal material, assays were sensitive and selective (99.8% of DNA amplified were genes from the target organism). Detection limits were 1-2 orders of magnitude higher for nL-qPCR than an existing enteric TaqMan Array Card (TAC), due to nanofluidic volumes. Compared to the TAC, nL-qPCR displayed 97% (95% CI 0.96, 0.98) negative percent agreement and 63% (95% CI 0.60, 0.66) overall positive percent agreement. Positive percent agreement was 90% for target concentrations above the nL-qPCR detection limits. nL-qPCR assays showed an underestimation bias of 0.34 log10 copies/gram of stool [IQR -0.41, -0.28] compared with the enteric TAC. Higher detection limits, inherent to nL-qPCR, do not hinder detection of clinically relevant pathogen concentrations. With 12 times higher throughput for a sixth of the per-sample cost of the enteric TAC, the nL-qPCR chip described here is a viable alternative for enteropathogen quantification for studies where other technologies are cost-prohibitive.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISLappan '20Sudarshan '26Raut '26Tang '26Delamare‐De '23Okpanachi '25
73% semantic matchMicrobiology
R. Lappan, R. Henry, S. L. Chown+15 more·bioRxiv·Oct 27, 2020