IVIM parameters have good scan-rescan reproducibility when evidential motion contaminated and poorly fitted image data are removed
Abstract
BackgroundIntravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM) diffusion MRI is a promising technique for liver pathology evaluation, but this techniques scan-rescan reproducibility has been reported to be unsatisfactory.\n\nObjectiveTo understand whether IVIM MRI parameters for liver parenchyma can be good after removal of motion contaminated and/or poorly fitted image data.\n\nMaterial and MethodsEighteen healthy volunteers had liver scanned twice at the same session to assess scan-rescan repeatability, and again in another session after an average interval of 13 days to assess reproducibility. Diffusion weighted image were acquired with a 3T scanner using respiratory-triggered echo-planar sequence and 16 b-values (0 to 800 s/mm2). Measurement was performed on the right liver with segmented-unconstrained least square fitting. Image series with evidential anatomical mismatch, apparent artifacts, and poorly fitted signal intensity vs. b-value curve were excluded. A minimum of three slices was deemed necessary for IVIM parameter estimation of a liver.\n\nResultsWith total 54 examinations, 6 scans did not satisfy inclusion criteria, leading to a success rate of 89%; and 14 volunteers were finally included. With each scan a mean of 5.3 slices (range: 3-10 slices) were utilized for analysis. Using threshold b-value=80s/mm2, the coefficient of variation and within-subject coefficient of variation for repeatability and reproducibility were: 2.86% and 4.24% for Dslow, 3.81% and 4.24%, for PF, 18.16% and 24.88% for Dfast; and those for reproducibility were 2.48% and 3.24% for Dslow; 4.91% and 5.38% for PF; 21.18% and 30.89% for Dfast.\n\nConclusionIVIM parameter scan-rescan reproducibility can be potentially good.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Intra-voxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging of the living human fetus: the technique and within-subject reproducibility
Jakab András, Ruth Tuura, … Ianina Scheer·European Radiology ExperimentalPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2017
- Different issue types have different signal intensity on b=0 images and its implication on intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) analysis: examples of liver MRI
B.-H. Xiao, Y.-X. Wang·bioRxiv·Mar 11, 2021
- Age and gender dependence of liver diffusion parameters and the evidence of intravoxel incoherent motion modelling of perfusion component is constrained by diffusion component.
H. Huang, C.-J. Zheng, … Y.-X. Wang·bioRxiv·Aug 27, 2020
- Dependence of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MR threshold b-value selection for separating perfusion and diffusion compartment and liver fibrosis diagnostic performance.
Yao Li, Pu-Xuan Lu, … Yi-Xiang Wang·bioRxiv·Dec 13, 2017
- A Combined Use Of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion MRI Parameters Can Differentiate Early Stage Hepatitis-B Fibrotic Livers From Healthy Livers
Y.-X. Wang, M. Deng, … P.-X. Lu·bioRxiv·May 25, 2017
- Ex vivo massively multidimensional diffusion-relaxation correlation MRI: scan-rescan reproducibility and caveats
Pak Or, Maxime Yon, … Dan Benjamini·bioRxiv·Mar 17, 2025