Sign in
NeuroscienceCognitive Neuroscience
Peer-reviewed journal article

Supracategorical fear information revealed by aversively conditioning multiple categories

Seth M. LevineiD, Miriam KumpfiD, Rainer RupprechtiD, Jens Volkmar SchwarzbachiD

Abstract

Fear-generalization is a critical function for survival, in which an organism extracts information from a specific instantiation of a threat (e.g., the western diamondback rattlesnake in my front yard on Sunday) and learns to fear--and accordingly respond to--pertinent higher-order information (e.g., snakes live in my yard). Previous work investigating fear-conditioning in humans has used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to demonstrate that activity-patterns of stimuli from an aversively-conditioned category (CS+) are more similar to each other than those of a neutral category (CS-). Here we designed a three-phase (i.e., baseline, conditioned, extinction) experiment using fMRI and multiple aversively-conditioned categories to ask whether we would find only similarity increases within the CS+ categories or also an increase in similarity between the CS+ categories. Using representational similarity analysis, we correlated a set of models to activity-patterns underlying several regions of interest and found that, following fear-conditioning, between-category and within-category similarity increased for the CS+ categories in the superior frontal gyrus (SFG) and the right temporal pole (rTP). Activity patterns in the object-selective lateral occipital cortex tended to prefer the semantic model, regardless of the experimental phase. These results advance prior pattern-based neuroimaging work by exploring the effect of aversively-conditioning multiple categories and indicate an extended role for the SFG and rTP in potentially linking discrete information or abstractly representing supracategorical information during fear-learning for the purpose of proper generalization.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISGabdulkhako '26Wood '20Rumpf '26Voogd '19Vincent '25Yin '20
74% semantic matchNeuroscience