Dissecting the co-segregation probability from genome architecture mapping
Abstract
The genome architecture mapping (GAM) is a recently developed methodology that offers the co-segregation probability of two genomic segments from an ensemble of thinly sliced nuclear profiles, enabling to probe and decipher the 3D chromatin organization. The co-segregation probability from GAM, which typically probes the length scale associated with the genomic separation greater than 1 MB, is, however, not identical to the contact probability obtained in Hi-C, and its correlation with inter-locus distance measured with FISH is not so good as the contact probability. In this study, by using a polymer-based model of chromatins, we derive a theoretical expression of the co-segregation probability as well as that of the contact probability, and carry out quantitative analyses of how they differ from each other. The results from our study, validated with in-silico GAM analysis on 3D genome structures from FISH, suggest that to attain strong correlation with the inter-locus distance, a properly normalized version of co-segregation probability needs to be calculated based on a large number of nuclear slices (n > 103). SIGNIFICANCEBy leveraging a polymer model of chromatin, we critically assess the utility of co-segregation probability captured from GAM analysis. Our polymer model, which offers analytical expressions for the co-segregation probability as well as for the contact probability and inter-locus distance, enables quantitative comparison between the data from GAM, Hi-C, and FISH. Although the plain co-segregation probabilities from GAM are not well correlated with inter-locus distances measured from FISH, properly normalized versions of the probability calculated from a large number of nuclear profiles can still reasonably represent the inter-locus distance. Our study offers instructions of how to take full advantage of GAM analysis in deciphering 3D genome organization.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparison of the Hi-C, GAM and SPRITE methods by use of polymer models of chromatin
L. Fiorillo, F. Musella, … M. Nicodemi·bioRxiv·Apr 24, 2020
- FISH-ing for captured contacts: towards reconciling FISH and 3C
Geoffrey Fudenberg, Maxim Imakaev·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Jun 12, 2017
- Computing 3D chromatin configurations from contact probability maps by Inverse Brownian Dynamics
K. Kumari, B. Duenweg, … R. P. Jagadeeshan·bioRxiv·Aug 31, 2019
- Multiplex-GAM: genome-wide identification of chromatin contacts yields insights not captured by Hi-C
Robert A. Beagrie, Christoph J. Thieme, … Ana Pombo·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Jun 19, 2023
- GAMtools: an automated pipeline for analysis of Genome Architecture Mapping data
Robert A. Beagrie, Markus Schueler·bioRxiv·Mar 20, 2017
- A universal polymer signature in Hi-C resolves cohesin loop density and supports monomeric extrusion
Kirill Polovnikov, Dmitry Starkov·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Apr 15, 2026