Sign in
BioinformaticsbioRxiv
Preprint

Leakage-Safe Cross-Cohort Transcriptomic Survival Analysis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Corrected Reanalysis

Mark Barsoum MarkarianiD, Garen Vagharshag Houssigian

Abstract

Background: Transcriptomic prognostic signatures in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are vulnerable to endpoint misspecification, heterogeneous specimen inclusion, platform effects and information leakage. We re-audited and replaced an earlier batch-harmonized alive/dead classifier. Methods: GSE71729 was audited for assay and composition but excluded from prognosis because its GEO Series Matrix does not provide an auditable patient-level survival join. Development used 176 TCGA-PAAD primary tumors with 92 deaths. A penalized Cox model was evaluated by repeated nested 5-fold cross-validation with filtering, scaling, outcome-guided screening and tuning learned inside each training partition. Cross-platform transport was tested without joint ComBat by holding out 79 survival-labelled primary tumors from GSE85916 (57 deaths), using a per-sample percentile-rank representation. Discrimination was summarized by Harrell's concordance index (C-index) with patient-bootstrap 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The five genes highlighted in version 1 were re-examined by cohort-specific Cox models and random-effects meta-analysis. Results: Internal TCGA C-index was 0.630 (95% CI 0.567-0.694). TCGA-to-GSE85916 C-index was 0.527 (0.435-0.607); reverse-direction transport was 0.576 (0.508-0.647). A fixed five-gene Cox model trained in TCGA gave external C-index 0.569 (0.476-0.657). None of the five random-effects associations survived Benjamini-Hochberg correction across the panel; heterogeneity was high (I2 74%-93%). Conclusions: The corrected data support exploratory transcriptomic signal within TCGA but not a validated transportable prognostic model or validated five-gene biomarker panel. Cohort mixing after batch correction is not evidence of biological preservation or external validity. The revised open workflow provides a reproducible basis for larger, prespecified multi-cohort studies.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISSandhu '19Nicolle '20Santiago '17Bhardwaj '22Krieger '22Hilmi '23
71% semantic matchGenomics
Vandana Sandhu, Knut Jørgen Labori, Ayelet Borgida+12 more·JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics·May 9, 2019· 10 citations