Uncertainties In Tumor Allele Frequencies Limit Power To Infer Evolutionary Pressures
Abstract
We read with great interest the paper by Williams, et. al.[1], who argued for neutral evolution in tumors by analyzing The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data. They supported this conclusion by showing high R2 values for fits to a neutral evolution model predicting M {propto} 1 / f, where M is the number of somatic mutations with allele frequency [≥] f. However, we believe a conclusion of neutrality must be treated cautiously, as high R2 values are consistent with many evolutionary models.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Reply: Neutral tumor evolution?
Timon Heide, Luis Zapata, … Andrea Sottoriva·bioRxiv·May 10, 2018
- A pan-cancer signature of neutral tumor evolution
Andrea Sottoriva, Trevor Graham·bioRxiv·Feb 11, 2015
- On measuring selection in cancer from subclonal mutation frequencies
I. Bozic, C. Paterson, B. Waclaw·bioRxiv·Jan 24, 2019
- A unified simulation model for understanding the diversity of cancer evolution
A. Niida, T. Hasegawa, … S. Miyano·bioRxiv·Jan 28, 2020
- Signatures of neutral evolution in exponentially growing tumors: a theoretical perspective
H.-R. Tung, R. Durrett·bioRxiv·Jul 29, 2020
- Comparison of Tug-of-War Models Assuming Moran versus Branching Process Population Dynamics
K. N. Dinh, M. K. Kurpas, M. Kimmel·bioRxiv·Oct 20, 2023