Sign in
NeurosciencebioRxiv
Preprint

Tracking the Fidelity of Internal Neural Representations with Error-In-Variables Regression

Isabel GaroniD, Stephen KeeleyiD, Alex H. WilliamsiD

Abstract

Internal neural representations can systematically deviate from externally measured sensory and behavioral variables, yet neuroscientists lack a principled statistical framework to quantify these mismatches. Here we introduce a nonlinear error-in-variables regression framework that explicitly models neural activity as a function of latent internal variables that deviate from measured sensory and behavioral variables. This approach uses a flexible basis expansion and a sampling-based inference scheme to jointly infer neuron-specific tuning functions, latent trajectories, and a representational fidelity parameter{kappa} that controls the strength of coupling between latent and measured variables. On synthetic datasets, the model accurately recovers latent dynamics, tuning curves, and identifies the true fidelity regime via cross-validated marginal likelihood. Applied to population recordings from mouse anterodorsal thalamic nucleus and rat medial entorhinal cortex across distinct sensory and behavioral conditions, the framework reveals condition-dependent changes in representational fidelity, tuning gain and profile, and uncovers latent population manifolds that are obscured in conventional tuning analyses. These results establish error-in-variables regression as a powerful and computationally tractable tool for tracking the fidelity of internal neural representations in systems neuroscience experiments.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISTaylor '20Lange '17Pospisil '21Wang '26Zhu '23Rubin '19
63% semantic matchNeuroscience
Robert T. Taylor, Paul M. Bays·Psychological Review·Mar 19, 2020· 20 citations