Sign in
GenomicsNature Medicine
Peer-reviewed journal article

Inhibition of p53 improves CRISPR/Cas-mediated precision genome editing

Emma Maria HaapaniemiiD, Sandeep Kumar BotlaiD, Jenna PerssoniD, Bernhard SchmiereriD, Jussi TaipaleiD

Abstract

We report here that genome editing by CRISPR/Cas9 induces a p53-mediated DNA damage response and cell cycle arrest. Transient inhibition of p53 prevents this response, and increases the rate of homologous recombination more than five-fold. This provides a way to improve precision genome editing of normal cells, but warrants caution in using CRISPR for human therapies until the mechanism of the activation of p53 is elucidated.

PDFDOI
Full-text digest ↓

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
1,265
FWCI
50.94
Field percentile
top 1%

In-depth summary

✦ Multi-agent verified full-text synthesis

Claude Sonnet 4.6 · xhigh effort · 7 Nov 2026 · from the full text of version 1 (25 Aug 2017) · CC BY 4.0

Cas9-induced double-strand breaks trigger p53/p21/RB1-dependent G1 arrest in RPE-1 cells; transient p53 inhibition via MDM2 markedly raises homologous recombination precision editing efficiency.

Normal and primary cells are hard to edit precisely because they favor error-prone repair or die, and earlier fixes (more template, NHEJ inhibitors, better transfection) gave gains of up to threefold without a mechanism. This work identifies a p53-dependent DNA damage response as an explanation, and one that also confounds dropout CRISPR screens.

Key results

  1. ShownIn genome-wide CRISPR dropout screens in human RPE-1 cells, p53 status determined whether essential genes could be detected; gRNAs against p53, p21 and RB1 were strongly enriched in p53 wild-type cells.

    Median rank of ribosomal gene gRNAs was 8,034 in p53+/+ (random depletion) vs 1,627 in p53-/- (lowest decile). p21 guides enriched 4.7 fold in p53+/+ vs 0.8 fold in p53-/-. Brunello library; GSEA found essential pathways only in p53-/-. · Main text; Figure legends

  2. ShownBrief, non-integrated Cas9 RNP exposure was enough to activate p53 signaling and G1 arrest in p53 wild-type RPE-1 cells but not in p53-null cells, without a detectable rise in apoptosis.

    RNP targeting the RNF1 locus raised p21 and the G1 fraction in p53+/+ cells (n=4, p<0.05). Cleaved Caspase 3 at 24h was not increased in p53+/+ (n=4). All readouts by flow cytometry. · Main text; Figure legends

  3. ShownSupplying the p53 antagonist MDM2 raised homologous recombination repair of a mutated GFP reporter in a dose-dependent way in p53 wild-type RPE-1 cells, indicating that the DNA damage response limits precision editing.

    GFP-positive percentage after RNP plus ssDNA repair template increased dose-dependently with MDM2 (n=6 per condition); abstract reports an HR increase of more than five-fold with transient p53 inhibition. · Abstract; Main text; Figure legends

  4. SuggestedInhibitors of type I interferon signaling branches did not improve precision editing in the GFP reporter line, so interferon response is probably not the main driver of Cas9 toxicity or G1 arrest in RPE-1 cells.

    None of the tested inhibitors (Toll-like receptor, interferon-alpha, interleukin 1 beta pathways), alone or in combination, significantly changed editing efficiency (Supplementary Table S2, not shown in text). · Main text

  5. ClaimedThe authors argue that editing selects for p53-deficient cells and that transient p53 inhibition has both benefits and tumorigenic risks, so therapeutic CRISPR use warrants caution.

    Based on screen enrichment of p53 pathway guides and the discussion; no data on chromosomal rearrangements or tumorigenic outcomes after p53 inhibition are presented in the text. · Abstract; Main text

Methods, data and reproducibility

Genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 dropout screens were compared in p53+/+ and p53-/- RPE-1 cells and analyzed with MAGeCK and gene set enrichment. RNP delivery assays and a GFP-repair reporter, read by flow cytometry, tested p53 response and the effect of MDM2 or interferon inhibitors.

  • Genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 dropout screens (Brunello library) in RPE-1 p53+/+ and p53-/- cells · human (RPE-1 cell line)
  • RNP transfection (RNF1 locus) readouts of p21, G1 fraction and cleaved Caspase 3 in RPE-1 p53+/+ and p53-/- · human (RPE-1 cell line) · n = n=4
  • RPE-1 p53+/+ mutant-GFP reporter line with RNP and ssDNA repair template, with MDM2 supplementation · human (RPE-1 cell line) · n = n=6 per condition
  • Interferon pathway inhibitor tests in the RPE-1-GFP reporter line · human (RPE-1 cell line)
Methods & tools
CRISPR/Cas9, Cas9 ribonucleoprotein (RNP) delivery, Brunello gRNA library, MAGeCK (modified Robust Rank Aggregation), Gene set enrichment analysis, Flow cytometry, MDM2 (p53 antagonist), GFP repair reporter with ssDNA template, Cleaved Caspase 3 assay
Reproducibility gaps
Screen methods and Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 are referenced but not in the provided text; MCF10A data are 'not shown'; no code or sequencing data accessions are given.
Limitations (4)
  • The mechanism by which Cas9 activates p53 is not elucidated, and the authors urge caution in therapeutic CRISPR use until it is understood. · stated by the authors
  • Inhibiting p53 leaves cells transiently vulnerable to chromosomal rearrangements and other tumorigenic mutations, and editing itself favors growth of p53-deficient cells. · stated by the authors
  • Functional editing tests used one immortalized line (RPE-1) and a GFP reporter with MDM2; primary cells, endogenous loci and indel-versus-precise-edit sequencing are not reported, and MCF10A data are not shown. · noted in this summary
  • The text reports no fold change or statistics for the MDM2 dose response beyond n=6; the five-fold figure appears only in the abstract. · noted in this summary

Who should read:Read this if you run CRISPR dropout screens or precision editing in p53-proficient normal cells and want evidence on p53-driven G1 arrest and its inhibition.

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.