Sign in
ImmunologyThe Journal of Immunology
Peer-reviewed journal article

C1q/MASP complexes - hybrid complexes of classical and lectin pathway proteins are found in the circulation

Anne RosbjergiD, Tereza Alica PlchováiD, Rafael Bayarri‐OlmosiD, Bettina Eide Holm, Ida Sandau Pedersen, Mikkel‐Ole Skjoedt, Peter GarrediD

Abstract

Complement pathways, traditionally regarded as separate entities in vitro, are increasingly noted for cross-communication and bypass mechanisms. Among these, the MBL/Ficolin/CL associated serine protease-3 (MASP-3) -- a component of lectin pathway pattern recognition receptors (PRMs) -- has shown the ability to process critical substrates like pro-factor D and insulin growth factor binding protein-5 (IGFBP-5). Given shared features between lectin pathway PRMs and C1q from the classical pathway, we hypothesized that C1q might be a viable in vivo binding partner for the MASPs. We used microscale thermophoresis, ELISA and immunoprecipitation assays to detect C1q/MASP complexes and functionally assessed the complexes through enzymatic cleavage assays. C1q/MASP-3 complexes were detected in human serum and correlated well with MASP-3 serum levels in healthy individuals. The binding affinity between MASP-3 and C1q in vitro was in the nanomolar range, and the interaction was calcium-dependent, as demonstrated by their dissociation in the presence of EDTA. Furthermore, most of the circulating C1q-bound MASP-3 was activated. Based on immunoprecipitatin, also C1q/MASP-2 complexes appereared to be present in serum. Finally, C1q/MASP-2 and C1q/MASP-3 in vitro complexes were able to cleave C4 and pro-factor D, respectively. Our study reveals the existence of C1q/MASP complexes in the circulation of healthy individuals and both C1q/MASP-2 and C1q/MASP-3 complexes display proteolytic activity. Hence, this study uncovers a crosstalk route between complement pathways not previously described.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
4
FWCI
0.60
Field percentile
top 41%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.