Academic integrity and plagiarism

The paper quantifies structural vulnerabilities and resilience to research integrity risks in biomedical research networks by analyzing retraction rates and citation patterns across fields.

This study examines if charging for corrections in the Journal of Cancer disincentivizes pre-publication handling of problematic image data, finding a modest impact after policy change.

This study detects AI-generated writing in biomedical literature, finding a sharp increase in 2025 with 12.4% of papers containing AI-written passages, especially from South Korea and China.

This study evaluates graduate students' perceptions of a research ethics training course, finding increased knowledge and self-efficacy in scientific ethics.

This study finds that 1.79% of ncRNA papers from 2000-2023 were retracted and 5.68% faced PubPeer concerns, with problematic papers increasing over time and impacting research integrity.