Sign in
BioinformaticsJournal of Computational Chemistry
Peer-reviewed journal article

Assessment of Molecular Mechanics-based Zn2+ Models in Mono- and Bimetallic Ligand Binding Sites

Okke MelseiD, Iris AntesiD, Ville R. I. KailaiD, Martin ZachariasiD

Abstract

Zn2+ ions play an important role in biology, but accurate sampling of metalloproteins using Molecular Mechanics remains challenging. Several models have been proposed to describe Zn2+ in biomolecular simulations, ranging from nonbonded models, employing classical 12-6 Lennard-Jones (LJ) potentials or extended LJ-potentials, to dummy-atom models and bonded models. We evaluated the performance of a large variety of these Zn2+ models in two challenging environments for which little is known about the performance of these methods, namely in a monometallic (Carbonic Anhydrase II) and a bimetallic ligand binding site (metallo-{beta}-lactamase VIM-2). We focused on properties which are important for a stable, correct binding site description during molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, because a proper treatment of the metal coordination and forces are here essential. We observed that the strongest difference in performance of these Zn2+ models can be found in the description of interactions between Zn2+ and non-charged ligating atoms, such as the imidazole nitrogen in histidine residues. We further show that the nonbonded (12-6 LJ) models struggle most in the description of Zn2+-biomolecule interactions, while the inclusion of ion-induced dipole effects strongly improves the description between Zn2+ and non-charged ligating atoms. The octahedral dummy-atom models result in highly stable simulations and correct Zn2+ coordination, and are therefore highly suitable for binding sites containing an octahedral coordinated Zn2+ ion. The results from this evaluation study in ligand binding sites can guide structural studies of Zn2+ containing proteins, such as MD-refinement of docked ligand poses and long-term MD simulations.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.