Replication protein Rep provides selective advantage to viruses in the presence of CRISPR-Cas immunity
W. Zhang, Y. Bhoobalan-Chitty, X. Zhai, H. Yan, L. H. Hansen, L. Deng, X. Peng
Abstract
Prokaryotic viruses express anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins to inhibit the host adaptive immune system, CRISPR-Cas. While the virus infection biology was shown to be strongly dependent on the relative strengths of the host CRISPR-Cas and viral Acrs, little is known about the role of the core processes of viral life cycle (replication, packaging etc) in defence/anti-defence arms race. Here, we demonstrate the selective advantage provided by a replication initiator, Rep, in the context of CRISPR-Acr interactions. First, we developed a two-host based CRISPR-Cas genome editing tool for the deletion of highly conserved and thus potentially important viral genes. Using this strategy, we deleted a highly conserved Rep-coding gene, gp16, from the genome of Sulfolobus islandicus rod-shaped virus 2 (SIRV2). The knockout mutant ({Delta}gp16) produced around 4 fold less virus in a CRISPR-null host, suggesting that Rep is the major contributor to replication initiation in Rudiviridae. Indeed, DNA sequencing revealed Rep-dependent replication initiation from the viral genome termini, in addition to Rep-independent replication initiation from non-terminal sites. Intriguingly, the lack of Rep showed a profound effect on virus propagation in a host carrying CRISPR-Cas immunity. Accordingly, the co-infecting parental virus (rep-containing) outcompeted the {Delta}gp16 mutant much more quickly in CRISPR-containing host than in CRISPR-null host, demonstrating a selective advantage provided by Rep in the presence of host CRISPR-Cas immunity. Despite the non-essentiality, rep is carried by all known members of Rudiviridae, which is likely an evolutionary outcome driven by the ubiquitous presence of CRISPR-Cas in Sulfolobales. ImportanceCRISPR-Cas and anti-CRISPR proteins are accessary to prokaryotes and their viruses respectively. To date, research has been focused on their diversity, molecular mechanisms and application in genome editing. How CRISPR-Acr arms race influence the evolution of viral core genes involved in the basic virus life cycle remained a gap of knowledge so far. This study provides the first evidence that CRISPR-Acr arms race poses a selection pressure on the efficiency of viral genome replication, forcing viruses to evolve highly productive replication machineries..
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Multilayered interaction between CRISPR-Cas subtype I-A and adjacently encoded Acrs of virus SIRV2
Yuvaraj Bhoobalan-Chitty, Nicodemus Dwiputra, … Xu Peng·bioRxiv·Apr 2, 2024
- To be or not to be an anti-CRISPR: AcrIII-1 and the importance of working with native biological systems
L. Martinez-Alvarez, D. Stickel, … X. Peng·bioRxiv·Jan 10, 2023
- A viral ring nuclease anti-CRISPR subverts type III CRISPR immunity
J. S. Athukoralage, S. McMahon, … M. F. White·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2019
- Diverse viral cas genes antagonize CRISPR immunity
M. A. Katz, E. M. Sawyer, … A. J. Meeske·bioRxiv·Jun 24, 2023
- Mre11-Rad50 enhances spacer acquisition in a haloarchaeal Type I-B CRISPR-Cas system
Alice K. Cassel, Héloïse Carion, Luciano A. Marraffini·bioRxiv·May 9, 2026
- A CRISPR-Cas9 screen reveals a role for WD repeat-containing protein 81 (WDR81) in the entry of late penetrating viruses
A. J. Snyder, A. T. Abad, P. Danthi·bioRxiv·Sep 26, 2021