How p53 stress memory could redirect JAK/STAT1 antiviral signalling: a model-based prediction.
M.K. Francis Didier TshianyiiD, Rebecca Walo OmanaiD, Apollinaire Mboma NDONDOiD, Kumwimba Seya DidieriD, Didier GonzeiD
Abstract
Viral infection can co-activate interferon (IFN)-JAK/STAT1 signalling and the p53 -Mdm2 stress-response pathway, two modules that jointly shape antiviral defence and cell-fate decisions. Here, we focus on viral infection contexts capable of inducing genotoxic stress associated with DNA double-strand breaks, thereby triggering oscillatory or sustained p53-Mdm2 dynamics. Whether p53 acts merely as a parallel stress pathway, or actively reshapes how an activated JAK/STAT1 response is temporally decoded and functionally routed, remains unclear. We develop a coupled ordinary-differential-equation model linking an IFN-{gamma}-centred JAK/STAT1 core, a p53 -Mdm2 module, downstream antiviral and apoptotic effectors, and a coarse-grained viral-burden layer, with p53 regulation placed downstream of STAT1 activation. We find that p53 does not simply increase nuclear STAT1 availability; it redistributes the response towards DNA-bound STAT1 persistence, transcriptional memory and STAT1-driven feedback, producing a persistence-recovery trade-off in which prior p53 stress prolongs the transcriptionally active STAT1 state but delays re-inducibility after repeated IFN stimulation. When IFN and p53-associated stress are both driven by viral burden, p53 is not a uniform amplifier of host defence: p53 preactivation strengthens the upstream memory layer, but downstream effectors buffer rather than mirror this priming. The model further separates antiviral-state engagement from realised viral control: strong effector activation does not guarantee suppression of poorly sensitive viral classes, whereas sensitive viral classes can be cleared before apoptosis. The origin of the stimulus also matters: exogenous IFN or p53 stimulation allows us to assess the hosts intrinsic response capacity, whereas virus-induced IFN and p53 stress remain coupled to viral persistence. Persistent viral burden thus emerges as the dynamical link between IFN induction, p53 stress-memory, antiviral maintenance, viral control and the choice between JAK/STAT-IRF1-associated, p53-autonomous or dual apoptotic routing.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Post-transcriptional regulatory feedback encodes JAK-STAT signal memory of interferon stimulation
E. Kalliara, M. Kardynska, … P. Paszek·bioRxiv·May 13, 2022
- Modeling the Co-Activation of Inflammatory Genes1Mediated by NFκB and IRF-3 During Viral Infections
Syona Tiwari, Soumen Basak, R. Pandey·bioRxiv·May 13, 2025
- ERK5 Signaling is Required for Type III IFN-mediated Mucosal Antiviral Responses
Hannah Bone, Dalia S. Natour, … Adriana Forero·bioRxiv·May 21, 2024
- STING activation of IRF3 is tuned by PELI2 to suppress basal activation and reinforce the anti-viral response
C. Ritchie, L. Li·bioRxiv·Apr 15, 2023
- IFN-κ directs antiviral immunity in human skin
Jafira M. Johnson, Laurellee Payne, … Megan H. Orzalli·bioRxiv·Sep 23, 2026
- Rabies virus antagonizes interferon signaling by targeting phosphorylated STAT1 tetramers
Miku Minami, Aoi Sugiyama, … Toyoyuki Ose·bioRxiv·Jul 30, 2026