Author

P. Dijkstra

Listed by name: these papers carry no ORCID for this author, so different people with the same name may be mixed together.

Biology Disciplines

Click to filter author papers

Microbiology· 5 Ecology· 2

Signature Assays, Organisms & Methods

Click to filter · or open tag

Assay:metagenomics· 6 Organism:bacteria (other)· 4 Approach:statistical model· 4 Research Focus:differential expression· 2 Research Focus:ecology & biodiversity· 2 Approach:experimental assay· 2 Research Focus:gene regulatory network inference· 2 Assay:metabolomics· 2

Frequent Co-Authors

B. A. Hungate· 5 shared P. F. Chuckran· 5 shared E. Schwartz· 4 shared E. T. Sieradzki· 3 shared S. J. Blazewicz· 3 shared D. Li· 2 shared H. Shim· 2 shared J. Li· 2 shared

Activity by Year

2021-2024 · peak 6/yr

Co-Author Collaboration Network

10 top collaborators · 27 mutual co-author links

Click any collaborator node to inspect or filter shared papers

Focal author (center)Selected co-authorORCID co-authorUnlinked name

Curved chords = mutual co-authorship

5 shared papersMicrobiology

B. A. Hungate

Mutual co-authors in cluster

Author profile →

7 papers

Recent·Most cited

Codon bias, nucleotide selection, and genome size predict in situ bacterial growth rate and transcription in rewetted soil

P. F. Chuckran, K. Estera-Molina, A. M. Nicolas, E. T. Sieradzki, P. Dijkstra, M. K. Firestone, J. Pett-Ridge, S. J. Blazewicz

The paper links genomic traits like codon bias and genome size to bacterial growth and transcription rates in rewetted soil using metagenomic and metatranscriptomic data.

bioRxiv · Jun 28, 2024 · PreprintMicrobiology

Edaphic controls on genome size and GC content of bacteria in soil microbial communities

P. F. Chuckran, C. Flagg, J. Propster, W. A. Rutherford, E. T. Sieradzki, S. J. Blazewicz, B. A. Hungate, J. A. Pett-Ridge, E. Schwartz, P. Dijkstra

The paper uses soil metagenomes to show that pH, soil carbon content, and nutrient availability influence bacterial genome size, GC content, and amino acid composition.

bioRxiv · Nov 17, 2021Ecology

Genomics-informed insights into microbial degradation of N,N-dimethylformamide

J. Li, P. Dijkstra, Q. Lu, S. Wang, S. Chen, D. Li, Z. Wang, Z. Jia, L. Wang, H. Shim

This study identifies genomic diversity and degradation pathways for N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) by analyzing 20,762 genomes, revealing plasmid-mediated degradation and anaerobic potential for methane production.

International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation · Sep 1, 2021Peer-reviewedMicrobiology

Soil, ocean, hot spring, and host-associated environments reveal unique selection pressures on genomic features of bacteria in microbial communities

P. F. Chuckran, B. A. Hungate, E. Schwartz, P. Dijkstra

The paper analyzes genomic features of bacteria across different environments, finding that genome size, GC content, and sigma-factor abundance vary with ecosystem type and environmental constraints.

bioRxiv · Apr 5, 2021Microbiology

Rapid response of nitrogen cycling gene transcription to labile carbon amendments in a soil microbial community

P. F. Chuckran, V. Fofanov, B. A. Hungate, E. M. A. Morrissey, E. Schwartz, J. Walkup, P. Dijkstra

This study shows that soil microbial communities rapidly alter transcription of nitrogen cycling genes in response to labile carbon amendments.

bioRxiv · Mar 26, 2021Microbiology

Mechanistic insights into the success of xenobiotic degraders resolved from metagenomes of microbial enrichment cultures

J. Li, C. Jia, Q. Lu, B. A. Hungate, P. Dijkstra, S. Wang, C. Wu, S. Chen, D. Li, H. Shim

The paper analyzes metagenomic data from microbial communities to identify strategies underlying xenobiotic degradation and their ecological interactions.

bioRxiv · Mar 3, 2021Microbiology

The Functional Significance of Bacterial Predators

B. A. Hungate, J. C. Marks, M. E. Power, E. Schwartz, K. J. van Groenigen, S. J. Blazewicz, P. F. Chuckran, P. Dijkstra, B. K. Finley, M. K. Firestone, M. M. Foley, A. Greenlon, M. Hayer, K. Hofmockel, B. J. Koch, , J. Pett-Ridge

This study quantifies the growth and carbon assimilation rates of predatory bacteria across 15 sites, showing obligate predators grow faster and assimilate more carbon than non-predatory bacteria.

bioRxiv · Feb 22, 2021Ecology