Sign in
Cancer BiologybioRxiv
Preprint

Gut Microbiome as a Diagnostic Biomarker for Early Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 18 Studies across Five Cancer Types

Mamadou Lamine TalliD

Abstract

BackgroundThe gut microbiome has emerged as a promising non-invasive biomarker for early cancer detection. However, evidence remains fragmented across individual studies with limited cross-cancer comparisons. ObjectivesTo systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of gut microbiome-based signatures across five major cancer types: colorectal cancer (CRC), gastric cancer (GC), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and lung cancer (LC). MethodsWe conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science (January 2000 - April 2026), following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies reporting area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for microbiome-based cancer classification were included. Pooled AUC estimates were derived using a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). ResultsEighteen studies (2,587 participants) met inclusion criteria. Pooled AUC values were: CRC 0.785 (95%CI 0.750-0.819; I2=30.6%), GC 0.834 (0.781-0.887; I2=56.6%), PDAC 0.853 (0.785-0.921; I2=60.8%), HCC 0.809 (0.747-0.871; I2=70.3%), and LC 0.780 (0.738-0.822; I2=25.0%). Fusobacterium nucleatum was consistently enriched across CRC, GC, and PDAC, while Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Akkermansia muciniphila were depleted in all five cancer types. Porphyromonas gingivalis showed the highest fold-change in PDAC (log{blacksquare}FC=+2.8). Risk of bias was moderate-to-high in all studies. ConclusionsGut microbiome profiling demonstrates good-to-excellent diagnostic accuracy (AUC 0.78-0.85) across five major cancer types. Shared cross-cancer biomarkers suggest common dysbiotic mechanisms amenable to pan-cancer screening. These findings support integration of microbiome signatures into multi-modal cancer detection platforms.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.