bioRxivCell BiologyPreprint
Evaluation of the cross reactivity of neutralising antibody response in vaccinated human and convalescent hamster sera against SARS-CoV-2 variants up to and including JN.1 using an authentic virus neutralisation assay
N. S. Coombes, K. R. Bewley, Y. Le Duff, N. Alami-Rahmouni, K. A. Ryan, S. Kempster, D. Ferguson, E. R. Davies, T. M. Weldon, E. S. Cross, L. Smith, C. Norris, K. R. Rogers-Broadway, K. Lewandowski, S. Treagus, S. T. Pullan, B. Hallis, S. Charlton, Y. Hall, S. G. P. Funnell
Abstract
New vaccines, therapeutics and immunity elicited by natural infection create evolutionary pressure on SARS-CoV-2 to evolve and adapt to evade vaccine-induced and infection-elicited immunity. Vaccine and therapeutics developers thus find themselves in an "arms race" with the virus. The ongoing assessment of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants remains essential as the global community transitions from an emergency response to a long-term management plan. Here, we describe how an authentic virus neutralisation assay using low passage clinical virus isolates has been employed to monitor resistance of emerging virus variants to neutralising antibodies from humans and experimentally infected hamsters. Sera and plasma from people who received three doses of a vaccine as well as those who received a bivalent booster were assessed against SARS-CoV-2 variants, up to and including JN.1. Contemporary or recent virus variants showed substantial resistance to neutralisation by antibodies from those who had received three doses of an ancestral vaccine but were still effectively neutralised by antibodies from individuals who had received a bivalent booster (ancestral/BA.1). In our recent studies, however, the JN.1 VOI was found to be significantly more resistant to neutralisation by antibodies from those who had received the ancestral/BA.1 bivalent boost. Convalescent sera from hamsters that had been experimentally infected with one of seven virus variants (ancestral, BA.1, BA.4, BA.5.2.1, XBB.1.5, XBB.1.16, XBB.2.3) were also tested here. The recent contemporary variant, BA.2.86, was effectively neutralised by sera from hamsters infected with XBB.1.5 and XBB.1.16 but it was not neutralised by sera from those infected with BA.5.2.1. These data support the recommendations given by the WHO that a new vaccine was required and should consist of an XBB sub-lineage antigen.
- organism: human
- organism: mouse
- assay: proteomics
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Antigenic cartography using hamster sera identifies SARS-CoV-2 JN.1 evasion seen in human XBB.1.5 booster sera
W. WANG, G. L. Bhushan, … C. D. Weiss·bioRxiv·Apr 5, 2024
- Direct comparison of SARS-CoV-2 variant specific neutralizing antibodies in human and hamster sera
A. Roessler, A. Netzl, … J. Kimpel·bioRxiv·Dec 19, 2023
- Infection and vaccine-induced neutralizing antibody responses to the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.1 variant
V.-V. Edara, L. Lai, … M. Suthar·bioRxiv·May 9, 2021
- Robust Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 Variants Including JN.1 and BA.2.87.1 by Trivalent XBB Vaccine-Induced Antibodies
- Sensitivity of infectious SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants to neutralizing antibodies
D. Planas, T. Bruel, … O. Schwartz·bioRxiv·Feb 12, 2021
- Distinct Patterns of SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.87.1 and JN.1 Variants in Immune Evasion, Antigenicity and Cell-Cell Fusion