Imperfect innate immune antagonism renders SARS-CoV-2 vulnerable towards IFN-γ and -{lambda}
M. Hayn, M. Hirschenberger, L. Koepke, J. H. Straub, R. Nchioua, M. H. Christensen, S. Klute, C. Prelli Bozzo, W. Aftab, F. Zech, C. Conzelmann, J. A. Mueller, S. Srinivasachar Badarinarayan, C. M. Stuerzel, I. Forne, S. Stenger, K.-K. Conzelmann, J. Muench, D. Sauter, F. I. Schmidt, A. Imhof, F. Kirchhoff, K. M. J. Sparrer
Abstract
The innate immune system constitutes a powerful barrier against viral infections. However, it may fail because successful emerging pathogens, like SARS-CoV-2, evolved strategies to counteract it. Here, we systematically assessed the impact of 29 SARS-CoV-2 proteins on viral sensing, type I, II and III interferon (IFN) signaling, autophagy and inflammasome formation. Mechanistic analyses show that autophagy and type I IFN responses are effectively counteracted at different levels. For example, Nsp14 induces loss of the IFN receptor, whereas ORF3a disturbs autophagy at the Golgi/endosome interface. Comparative analyses revealed that antagonism of type I IFN and autophagy is largely conserved, except that SARS-CoV-1 Nsp15 is more potent in counteracting type I IFN than its SARS-CoV-2 ortholog. Altogether, however, SARS-CoV-2 counteracts type I IFN responses and autophagy much more efficiently than type II and III IFN signaling. Consequently, the virus is relatively resistant against exogenous IFN-/{beta} and autophagy modulation but remains highly vulnerable towards IFN-{gamma} and -{lambda} treatment. In combination, IFN-{gamma} and -{lambda} act synergistically, and drastically reduce SARS-CoV-2 replication at exceedingly low doses. Our results identify ineffective type I and II antagonism as weakness of SARS-CoV-2 that may allow to devise safe and effective anti-viral therapies based on targeted innate immune activation.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evolutionary arms race between SARS-CoV-2 and interferon signaling via dynamic interaction with autophagy.
J. S. Lee, M. Dittmar, … S. Cherry·bioRxiv·Nov 13, 2023
- Type I interferon susceptibility distinguishes SARS-CoV-2 from SARS-CoV.
K. G. Lokugamage, A. Hage, … V. D. Menachery·Journal of VirologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 9, 2020
- Distinct Inductions of and Responses to Type I and Type III Interferons PromoteInfections in Two SARS-CoV-2 Isolates
F. Hsin, T.-L. Chao, … H. M. Liu·bioRxiv·Apr 30, 2020
- Multiple layers of innate immune response antagonism of SARS-CoV-2
Fuchun Zhou, Sivakumar Periasamy, … Alexander A. Bukreyev·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 20, 2026
- Pre-existing interferon gamma conditions the lung to mediate early control of SARS-CoV-2
K. L. Hilligan, S. Namasivayam, … A. Sher·bioRxiv·Jul 15, 2023
- SARS-CoV-2 ORF9b Antagonizes Type I and III Interferons by Targeting Multiple Components of RIG-I/MDA-5-MAVS, TLR3-TRIF, and cGAS-STING Signaling Pathways
L. Han, M.-W. Zhuang, … C. Gao·bioRxiv·Aug 16, 2020