Tumor subclones, where are you?
X. Su, S. Bai, G. Xie, Y. Shi, L. Zhao, G. Yang, F. Tian, K.-Y. He, L. Wang, X. Li, Q. Long, Z.-G. Han
Abstract
IntroductionTumor clonal structure is closely related to future progression, which has been mainly investigated via mutation abundance clustering in bulk sample. With limited studies at single-cell resolution, a systematic comparison of the two approaches is still lacking. MethodsHere, using bulk and single-cell mutational data from liver and colorectal cancers, we would like to check the possibility of obtaining accurate tumor clonal structures from bulk-level analysis. We checked whether co-mutations determined by single-cell analysis had corresponding bulk variant allele frequency (VAF) peaks. We examined VAF ranges for different groups of co-mutations, and also the possibility of discriminating them. ResultsWhile bulk analysis suggested absence of subclonal peaks and possibly neutral evolution in some cases, single-cell analysis identified co-existing subclones. The overlaps of bulk VAF ranges for co-mutations from different subclones made it difficult to separate them, even with other parameter introduced. The difference between mutation cluster and tumor subclone is accountable for the challenge in bulk clonal deconvolution, especially in case of branched evolution as shown in colorectal cancer. ConclusionComplex subclonal structures and dynamic evolution are hidden under the seemingly clonal neutral pattern at bulk level, suggesting single-cell analysis will be needed to avoid under-estimation of tumor heterogeneity. Research HighlightsO_LIBulk-level mutation abundance clusters are not equal to tumor subclones. C_LIO_LIDifferent groups of co-mutations could not be discriminated at bulk-level. C_LIO_LISingle-cell mutational analysis can identify rather than infer tumor subclones. C_LIO_LICo-existing tumor subclones may have clonal neutral appearance at bulk-level. C_LI Lay summarySystematic comparison of tumor clonal structure differences between bulk and single-cell mutational analysis is lacking. Here we performed such as study and found that complex subclonal structures and dynamic evolution are hidden under clonal neutral appearance at bulk level in liver and colorectal cancers, suggesting single-cell analysis will be needed to avoid under-estimation of tumor heterogeneity.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Integrative inference of subclonal tumour evolution from single-cell and bulk sequencing data
Salem Malikić, Katharina Jahn, … Niko Beerenwinkel·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jun 21, 2019
- Biased evolutionary inferences from bulk tumor samples
J.M. Alves, T. Prieto, D. Posada·bioRxiv·Nov 25, 2016
- Unexpectedly High Subclonal Mutational Diversity in Human Colorectal Cancer and Its Significance
L. A. Loeb, B. Kohrn, … R. A. Beckman·bioRxiv·Jun 21, 2019
- Resolving clonal substructure from single cell genomic data using CopyKit
Darlan Conterno Minussi, Emi Sei, … Nicholas E. Navin·bioRxiv·Mar 9, 2022
- Resolving sub-clonal heterogeneity within cell-line growths by single cell sequencing genomic DNA
Enrique I. Velazquez-Villarreal, Shamoni Maheshwari, … David Wesley Craig·bioRxiv·Sep 5, 2019
- Tracing the evolution of aneuploid cancers from multiregional sequencing
Subhayan Chattopadhyay, Jenny Karlsson, … David Gisselsson·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 10, 2021